When to rethink your payment stack
How many engineering hours are going into holding your payment stack together? When your team spends more time debugging legacy gateway issues than shipping new product, the stack isn’t just outdated—it’s slowing you down. Some cracks are subtle: latency creeping up, wallets missing from your checkout, or reconciliation that relies on spreadsheet gymnastics. Others are loud: missed markets, rising decline rates, or fees that grow faster than your margins.
The layers of your stack: anatomy of a modern setup
Today’s payment infrastructure runs deeper than a nice-looking checkout. It’s a system of interdependent layers that collectively shape the customer experience, transaction outcomes, and operational efficiency.
Frontend
This is the first touchpoint users see. Hosted checkouts are simple to deploy, offering basic compliance and off-the-shelf design. But they often lack the finesse needed for conversion-driven experiences. Embedded checkouts, on the other hand, allow for greater UX control, localisation, and responsive design across devices—elements that matter when optimising checkout performance.
Middleware
Often the most overlooked, this layer manages orchestration logic. It determines how transactions are routed, how retries are triggered, and which fallback mechanisms come into play. Payment orchestration platforms can abstract complexity here by consolidating APIs and enabling rule-based routing. This is especially crucial when managing diverse processors, regional gateways, or failover strategies across markets.
Backend
This is your payment engine room. Gateways connect to acquiring banks and card networks. Acquirers handle authorisation and settlement. Settlement tools manage payout timing and reporting. If this layer is too rigid—locked into a single provider or region—you’ll face constraints when expanding globally or adapting to local regulation. A modern backend supports multiple acquirers, handles multi-currency reconciliation, and provides transparency across all financial touchpoints.
Red flags: when performance lags behind expectation
If your payment infrastructure isn't keeping pace, signs tend to show up in familiar places. Watch for these common issues:
- Drop in payment success or authorisation rates: A surge in transaction declines can point to outdated routing, poor gateway performance, or lack of local acquirers.
- High fraud false positives: Fraud management tools that trigger incorrectly can reject good users and cost sales.
- Reconciliation delays: If your finance team relies on manual matching or inconsistent reports, something’s broken.
- Missing payment methods: Not supporting popular wallets or local options in key markets can drive abandonment.
- Slow response times: Latency in checkout or payment APIs can chip away at user trust.
- Unexplained fee increases: Rising transaction costs, especially for cross-border payments, may point to inefficient routing or outdated processor agreements.
- Support for new markets lags: If launching in a new region means scrambling to meet local payment preferences or compliance, your stack may be too rigid.
These aren’t just technical hiccups—they’re business signals. And they rarely fix themselves.. Maybe it’s a single gateway struggling with cross-border payments. Maybe your fraud tools are blocking legitimate users. Or maybe new wallets and local methods never made it onto the roadmap.
What to audit: from gateways to reconciliation
A payment stack audit isn’t just a tech health check—it’s a commercial one. It should cover performance, cost, resilience, and alignment with current business strategy. Here’s a checklist to guide the process:
Component |
What to look for |
Gateways |
Are they reliable across all markets? Are fallback options in place? |
Acceptance rates |
Any significant drops in approval rates by region, method, or provider? |
Payment APIs |
Are the APIs consistent, well-documented, and fast enough for real-time needs? |
Fraud management tools |
Are false positives reducing legitimate transactions? Are risk rules adjustable? |
Reconciliation process |
Is finance relying on manual workarounds? Are reports standardised and timely? |
Reporting and analytics |
Do you have real-time access to key transaction metrics? |
Payment method coverage |
Are local wallets and preferred methods supported in every live market? |
Fee visibility |
Can you trace actual cost per transaction, including FX and cross-border surcharges? |
Settlement tools |
How flexible are your payout options? Are they compatible with multi-currency flows? |
Dispute resolution |
Are chargebacks handled efficiently? Are tools in place for rapid resolution? |
Each of these areas can reveal hidden friction or cost, and point to where your payment infrastructure needs the most attention.. Look at gateway performance across markets. Are your fraud controls triggering too many false positives? Is your reporting layer keeping pace with finance? And most importantly, are your payment APIs helping or hindering integration?
It is also important to audit your customers' user experience. How do your payment systems work for them? If your stack doesn't offer multiple payment methods or accept payments from popular digital wallets that almost certainly impacts conversions and revenue.
Metrics that matter: measuring the stack's value
Focus on signals, not noise. Payment stack performance is about more than uptime or error logs—it’s about impact. These are the metrics worth tracking:
- Authorisation rates: Look at this by geography, issuer, and payment method. Declines could highlight the need for local acquiring or smarter routing.
- Conversion rates: A seamless checkout experience supported by fast APIs and preferred payment methods will push this up.
- Time-to-settlement: How long does it take from payment to funds reaching your account? The answer shapes your cash flow model.
- Chargeback ratio: A rising rate might indicate poor fraud filters or customer dissatisfaction. Good tools should help you flag disputes early.
- Processing cost per transaction: Include base fees, currency conversion, retries, reversals. It’s often higher than expected.
- Retry success rate: If you’re retrying failed payments, how many are recovered? Orchestration tools can influence this significantly.
- API response time and uptime: These underpin user trust. Lag or outages translate into real revenue loss.
- Decline reason visibility: Can you actually track why a transaction was declined? Without this, improvements remain guesswork.
If you can’t see these numbers, you can’t shape them. And if you can’t shape them, you’re not in control of your payments.
Optimisation without starting over
You don’t always need to rebuild. Often, smart layering and selective updates can resolve the most urgent constraints without disrupting everything. A staged optimisation approach keeps engineering focus tight and business momentum intact.
Here are ways to unlock performance without a total overhaul:
- Introduce payment orchestration middleware: Add a layer that manages routing, retries, and gateway selection without needing to rip out your existing providers.
- Deploy modular APIs: Replace brittle legacy endpoints with modular APIs that can evolve independently.
- Implement a multi-gateway strategy: Use different gateways for specific geographies or transaction types to improve success rates and redundancy.
- Layer in real-time fraud detection: If your current stack lacks nuance, bolt on adaptive risk tools that refine decisions without blocking legitimate traffic.
- Automate reconciliation: Integrate reporting tools that standardise data feeds and reduce manual processing for finance.
- Incremental rollout of new payment methods: Use wrappers or API gateways to trial and scale new wallets or APMs without full-code deployment.
Begin where friction is highest. Whether it’s checkout UX or settlement delays, focused adjustments can give you room to grow without the disruption of a full replatforming.. Often, the right orchestration logic or modular integration can buy you time and flexibility. A multi-gateway setup with fallback rules may solve more than a full replatforming. Start with what’s breaking first, not what’s easiest to change.
From patchwork to platform: a smarter stack strategy
Not everything needs to be built in-house. In fact, insisting on doing so often creates delays, limits market agility, and burdens engineering teams with complexity that could be avoided. A smarter approach is to focus inward where you differentiate, and partner outward where others already excel.
Here’s how to move from patchwork to platform:
- Consolidate orchestration: Replace scattered custom scripts and ad hoc routing rules with a single orchestration layer. This reduces failure points and centralises control.
- Decentralise localisation: Allow regional flexibility for acquiring, payment methods, and compliance. What works in Southeast Asia isn’t always right for Europe or North America.
- Standardise interfaces: Use common APIs across markets and payment methods. This simplifies integrations and maintenance.
- Centralise reporting and analytics: Bring all data into one view so finance, product, and operations can align on performance and revenue goals.
- Abstract vendor logic: Treat payment providers as interchangeable components. That way, you can switch, scale, or test without rewriting your infrastructure.
This approach moves you from maintaining brittle systems to designing for growth. From chasing fixes to steering the roadmap. From patchwork to platform.. Focus your team on what gives you edge, and partner where scale and local know-how matter. Centralise orchestration, decentralise what needs regional nuance. Aim for control, not clutter.
Why Antom could be the right fit
Antom brings local expertise and a lean integration model that keeps your engineering team in control. From modular APIs to region-specific fraud prevention and flexible settlement, Antom is a trusted payment service partner to global merchants like Shein, Uber and Spotify.