Managing how and when you take payment is central to both customer experience and your own financial control. One important option is delayed capture. By separating authorisation from capture - in other words, the process of moving funds from your customer's account to yours - you gain flexibility in timing without losing the assurance of reserved funds. Understanding this process can help you reduce risk, handle operational complexity, and improve cash flow management.
Sometimes called capture delay or deferred capture, delayed capture is where a payment is authorised but the actual capture of funds happens later. When a buyer uses a card or another payment method, the issuing bank places an authorisation hold on the account. This confirms that the customer has enough funds and reserves the amount, but the merchant does not immediately receive the money. Only after a capture request is submitted are the funds transferred. This approach is widely used for card payments, credit card transactions, and digital commerce where timing matters.
Put simply, authorisation and capture are two distinct stages: first, the payment is authorised; then, at the right moment, it is captured.
The flow of delayed capture follows a clear sequence:
This process provides more flexibility than immediate capture. It allows businesses to delay the capture of a payment until they are certain the goods or services can be delivered.
Delayed capture is commonly used in industries where the service or product is delivered after the booking or order.
Hotels often apply delayed capture when a guest books a room. The card is authorised at the time of booking, but funds are only captured at check-in or check-out, depending on policy.
Rental companies authorise a card at pick-up to cover both the rental cost and possible damages. The actual capture happens when the car is returned.
Airlines may use capture delay when confirming flight availability. The payment is authorised but captured only once the ticket is issued.
Online stores sometimes delay capture until the item is confirmed in stock and ready to ship, reducing the chance of refund requests.
Services offering trial periods may authorise a payment method upfront but only capture funds when the subscription period begins.
The distinction lies in timing. With immediate capture, authorisation and capture occur in one step, meaning the merchant collects funds right away. With delayed capture, authorisation and capture are separated.
Immediate capture |
Delayed capture |
|
Timing of funds transfer |
At the moment of purchase |
After a later capture request |
Control over settlement |
Limited |
High |
Flexibility for changes |
Low |
High |
Fraud and risk management |
Minimal |
Enhanced |
Administrative workload |
Lower |
Higher |
Pros |
Immediate access to funds; simpler accounting |
Greater flexibility; stronger fraud control; improved customer experience |
Cons |
Less adaptable to changes; higher refund handling |
Requires monitoring of holds; potential extra administrative work |
Merchants should work closely with their payment service provider (PSP). Configuration depends on the PSP’s system and may involve setting business rules, enabling manual capture, or defining automatic capture delays. Establishing this correctly ensures that authorisation holds are managed effectively and that funds are captured within the allowed timeframe.
The setup process will vary by payment provider, but the general steps are straightforward:
The main advantage of delayed capture is control: merchants decide when settlement happens. This approach helps avoid issues with refunds, supports smoother operations, and reassures customers that they’re charged at the right point. Global providers such as Antom support both immediate and delayed capture across multiple payment methods, allowing merchants to choose the best setup for their business model.